The TMS migration problem isn't just another IT headache waiting to happen. The 76% who struggle skip the planning, underestimate the complexity, and treat their TMS like a simple software purchase rather than a strategic transformation. When a German automotive parts manufacturer discovered after six months that their
Supply chain managers know the frustration: manual processing costs the average enterprise nearly $10 per invoice and takes roughly 11 days to complete, but not every supplier in your network can handle EDI. While you've automated transactions with 60% of your major partners through structured EDI integration, that
Manual EDI mapping automation has become an expensive bottleneck for companies managing TMS integration projects, with the average company handling 100-200 trading partners and 400-500 maps that require extensive manual work. Organizations typically spend $62,000 annually on mapping projects and ongoing consultant fees, but AI is dramatically simplifying this
The No. 1 risk facing supply chains tops out with a 97% threat level according to Everstream Analytics' 2026 Risk Report: "Geopolitical Fragmentation and Strategic Use of Trade Regulations." Export controls on critical minerals doubled from 2023 to 2025, while other trade restrictions increased 167%. Your EDI
SAP ECC customers running systems with enhancement packages 1-5 face an even tighter squeeze than most realize. While companies using enhancement packages 6-8 have until December 31, 2027, those on packages 1-5 lose mainstream maintenance by December 31, 2025. Gartner's data shows that by late 2024, only 39%
The retail supply chain has hit a critical juncture where suppliers face a landscape that can "feel impossible to keep up" with. 2026 continues to be considered the throne of the omnichannel trend, making omnichannel fulfillment increasingly indispensable for retailers who want to stay competitive. Yet here'
Your supplier network processes 847 EDI purchase orders monthly, handles API calls from three major retailers, and still receives 23% of orders as PDF attachments via email. Each channel demands different response times, data formats, and integration protocols. Welcome to the omnichannel EDI integration crisis that's costing suppliers
Your supply chain operations already depend on hybrid EDI automation to handle trading partners at different technological stages. The harsh reality? You work with a mix of retailers and clients who still send orders by PDFs, spreadsheets, emails and attachments. This creates a costly operational tax that compounds every time
Supply chain leaders are waking up to a harsh reality: EDI digital fragility has become their biggest blind spot. While you've spent years hardening physical supply chains against disruptions, your digital backbone—the EDI systems and APIs that move 90% of your transactional data—remains dangerously vulnerable to
The numbers tell a sobering story. Third-party vendor and supply chain compromise was the second most prevalent attack vector and second costliest at $4.91 million, while ransomware victims projected to increase by 40% compared to 2024, third-party breaches doubling to 30% of all incidents, and AI-driven attacks expected to
Most transportation management system implementations fail during one specific phase: the attempt to replace EDI entirely with APIs. While 85% of supply chain transactions are still managed through EDI, companies continue pursuing binary migration strategies that break established trading partner networks. The solution isn't choosing between legacy protocols
When EDI transactions meet supply chain complexity, traditional point-to-point data exchange hits a wall. You receive an 850 purchase order, send back an 855 acknowledgment, ship the goods with an 856 advance ship notice. Simple enough. But what happens when your customer asks "Which suppliers impacting my delivery delays